<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Film and Digital Times: News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fdtimes.com/news/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news</link>
	<description>The Journal of Art, Technique and Technology in Film, Video and Digital Production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:47:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Otto as Art by Robert Starling, SOC</title>
		<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news/art/otto-as-art/comment-page-1/#comment-4103</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Starling, SOC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fdtimes.com/news/?p=6707#comment-4103</guid>
		<description>Great find Jon!  Sorry I missed you at the Angenieux dinner Saturday night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great find Jon!  Sorry I missed you at the Angenieux dinner Saturday night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clairmont In-Camera Alexa Filters by Jordan Cushing</title>
		<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news/clairmont/clairmont-in-camera-alexa-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-4055</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Cushing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fdtimes.com/news/?p=5319#comment-4055</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey: you can change the filters yourself, you just can&#039;t change the flange depth so you need to always have a filter in there (even if it&#039;s clear - optical flat).  You do need to remove the lens though, so not as quick as pulling one out of the matte box.  Hassan: you don&#039;t have to have NDs in the mattebox when you&#039;re outdoors, also harder to flare...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey: you can change the filters yourself, you just can&#8217;t change the flange depth so you need to always have a filter in there (even if it&#8217;s clear &#8211; optical flat).  You do need to remove the lens though, so not as quick as pulling one out of the matte box.  Hassan: you don&#8217;t have to have NDs in the mattebox when you&#8217;re outdoors, also harder to flare&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First ALEXA Studio at Clairmont by Michael Condon, VP Digital Division, Clairmont Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news/arri/first-alexa-studio-at-clairmont/comment-page-1/#comment-4049</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Condon, VP Digital Division, Clairmont Camera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fdtimes.com/news/?p=6506#comment-4049</guid>
		<description>Clairmont Camera DID indeed receive the first Alexa Studio camera in the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clairmont Camera DID indeed receive the first Alexa Studio camera in the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Joe Dunton Buys Kodak by Film and Digital Times: If Joe Dunton Buys Kodak &#124; Kelly On A Tangent</title>
		<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news/cameras/if-joe-dunton-buys-kodak/comment-page-1/#comment-4034</link>
		<dc:creator>Film and Digital Times: If Joe Dunton Buys Kodak &#124; Kelly On A Tangent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fdtimes.com/news/?p=6562#comment-4034</guid>
		<description>[...] If Joe Dunton Buys Kodak &#124; Film and Digital Times: News. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If Joe Dunton Buys Kodak | Film and Digital Times: News. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Joe Dunton Buys Kodak by Jeff Kreines</title>
		<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news/cameras/if-joe-dunton-buys-kodak/comment-page-1/#comment-4029</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Kreines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fdtimes.com/news/?p=6562#comment-4029</guid>
		<description>A film person running Kodak?  What a novel idea!  Perhaps Joe could bring back B&amp;W stocks (including print stocks) with high silver content?  

But there is a fatal flaw, I&#039;m afraid -- what does Joe know about Kodak&#039;s core mission:  making mediocre inkjet printers?

Jeff &quot;watching Kodak shoot itself in the foot since the Hunt Brothers fiasco&quot; Kreines</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A film person running Kodak?  What a novel idea!  Perhaps Joe could bring back B&amp;W stocks (including print stocks) with high silver content?  </p>
<p>But there is a fatal flaw, I&#8217;m afraid &#8212; what does Joe know about Kodak&#8217;s core mission:  making mediocre inkjet printers?</p>
<p>Jeff &#8220;watching Kodak shoot itself in the foot since the Hunt Brothers fiasco&#8221; Kreines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Joe Dunton Buys Kodak by Mark Forman</title>
		<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news/cameras/if-joe-dunton-buys-kodak/comment-page-1/#comment-4028</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Forman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fdtimes.com/news/?p=6562#comment-4028</guid>
		<description>Society of Camera Operators is the current name for the S.O.C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Society of Camera Operators is the current name for the S.O.C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BSC Show by Film and Digital Times: The British Society of Cinematographers Show &#124; Kelly On A Tangent</title>
		<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news/trade-shows/bsc-show/comment-page-1/#comment-4022</link>
		<dc:creator>Film and Digital Times: The British Society of Cinematographers Show &#124; Kelly On A Tangent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fdtimes.com/news/?p=6554#comment-4022</guid>
		<description>[...] BSC Show &#124; Film and Digital Times: News. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BSC Show | Film and Digital Times: News. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Data Wrangling Sony HXR-NX70 on Mac by Jean Philippe</title>
		<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news/sony/data-wrangling-sony-hxr-nx70-on-mac/comment-page-1/#comment-3979</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Philippe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fdtimes.com/news/?p=4948#comment-3979</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Thank you for the article which introduced me to Clipwrap: I convert to QuickTime files.
I do pre-construction videos. Let&#039;s say I videotape a street with a videocamera Sony NX70u on an SDHC memory card. I want to burn a &#039;&#039;regular&#039;&#039; SD DVD or a BluRay DVD. Right now I connect the NX70 to a MC10 Sony DVD recorder via SVHS cable +the RCA audio. I press play on the camera and 1 hour later I have 1 DVD. 

With these settings on the videocamera: 
HD: MPEG4-AVC/H.264 AVCHD
PS (28 Mbps) 1920 x 1080/60p
or
FH (17 Mbps) 1920 x 1080/60i

It takes only an hour/DVD, no computer. BUT I want to improve the DVD picture quality. I know it&#039;s a DVD and from HD there&#039;s a downgrade but there must be a way to get something better without spending hours on a computer. I do not do any editing for these DVDs. It&#039;s a transfer from shooting to DVD.

Any suggestion?

Thank you for your help.
JP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Thank you for the article which introduced me to Clipwrap: I convert to QuickTime files.<br />
I do pre-construction videos. Let&#8217;s say I videotape a street with a videocamera Sony NX70u on an SDHC memory card. I want to burn a &#8221;regular&#8221; SD DVD or a BluRay DVD. Right now I connect the NX70 to a MC10 Sony DVD recorder via SVHS cable +the RCA audio. I press play on the camera and 1 hour later I have 1 DVD. </p>
<p>With these settings on the videocamera:<br />
HD: MPEG4-AVC/H.264 AVCHD<br />
PS (28 Mbps) 1920 x 1080/60p<br />
or<br />
FH (17 Mbps) 1920 x 1080/60i</p>
<p>It takes only an hour/DVD, no computer. BUT I want to improve the DVD picture quality. I know it&#8217;s a DVD and from HD there&#8217;s a downgrade but there must be a way to get something better without spending hours on a computer. I do not do any editing for these DVDs. It&#8217;s a transfer from shooting to DVD.</p>
<p>Any suggestion?</p>
<p>Thank you for your help.<br />
JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 4K DSLR/Cine Camera by Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news/canon/canon-4k-dslrcine-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-3962</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fdtimes.com/news/?p=6080#comment-3962</guid>
		<description>These days instead of 4K video. I&#039;d rather have a camera capable of doing RAW video. Which seems right now to only be the C300 or the Red. The depth is in the shadows and to be able to see many more levels of blacks is nicer that just a bigger screen IMO. Especially since most people don&#039;t even have a way to show these 4K videos yet. There&#039;s not many movie theaters that are even set up for 4K yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days instead of 4K video. I&#8217;d rather have a camera capable of doing RAW video. Which seems right now to only be the C300 or the Red. The depth is in the shadows and to be able to see many more levels of blacks is nicer that just a bigger screen IMO. Especially since most people don&#8217;t even have a way to show these 4K videos yet. There&#8217;s not many movie theaters that are even set up for 4K yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Band Pro&#8217;s First 25 F65 Cameras by Film and Digital Times: Band Pro’s First 25 F65 Cameras &#124; Kelly On A Tangent</title>
		<link>http://www.fdtimes.com/news/sony/band-pros-first-25-f65-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-3961</link>
		<dc:creator>Film and Digital Times: Band Pro’s First 25 F65 Cameras &#124; Kelly On A Tangent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fdtimes.com/news/?p=6517#comment-3961</guid>
		<description>[...] Band Pro’s First 25 F65 Cameras &#124; Film and Digital Times: News. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Band Pro’s First 25 F65 Cameras | Film and Digital Times: News. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

